Comparación entre las calculadoras de riesgo del European Randomized Study for Screening of Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) y Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group (PBCG): predicción del riesgo de cáncer de próstata clínicamente significativo en una cohorte de pacientes de Argentina / Comparison between the European Randomized Study for Screening of Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) and Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group (PBCG) risk calculators: Prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer risk in a cohort of patients from Argentina

Objetivo Comparar el desempeño de las calculadoras de riesgo del European Randomised Study for Screening of Prostate Cancer (ERSPC-RC) y el Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group (PBCG-RC) en predecir el riesgo de presentar cáncer de próstata clínicamente significativo. Material y métodos Retrospectivamente, se identificó a los pacientes que fueron sometidos a biopsia prostática en el Sanatorio Allende Cerro, Ciudad de Córdoba, Argentina, desde enero de 2018 a diciembre de 2021. Se calculó la probabilidad de tener cáncer de próstata con las dos calculadoras por separado y luego se compararon los resultados para establecer cuál de las dos tuvo mejor desempeño. Para esto, se analizaron áreas bajo la curva (ABC). Resultados Se incluyeron 250 pacientes, 140 (56%) presentaron cáncer de próstata, de los cuales 92 (36,8%) tuvieron cáncer de próstata clínicamente significativo (Score de Gleason ≥7). Los pacientes que presentaron cáncer tenían mayor edad, mayor valor de antígeno prostático específico (PSA) y menor tamaño prostático. El ABC para predecir la probabilidad de tener cáncer de próstata clínicamente significativo fue de 0,79 y 0,73 para PBCG-RC y ERSPC-RC, respectivamente (p=0,0084). Conclusión En esta cohorte de pacientes, ambas calculadoras de riesgo de cáncer de próstata mostraron un buen desempeño para predecir el riesgo de cáncer de próstata clínicamente significativo, si bien el PBCG-RC mostró mejor exactitud. (AU)

Objective To compare the performance of the risk calculators of the European Randomized Study for Screening of Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) and the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group (PBCG) in predicting the risk of presenting clinically significant prostate cancer. Material and methods Retrospectively, patients who underwent prostate biopsy at Sanatorio Allende Cerro, Ciudad de Córdoba, Argentina, were identified from January 2018 to December 2021. The probability of having prostate cancer was calculated with the two calculators separately and then the results were compared to establish which of the two performed better. For this, areas under the curve (AUC) were analyzed. Results 250 patients were included, 140 (56%) presented prostate cancer, of which 92 (65.71%) had clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason score ≥7). The patients who presented cancer were older, had a higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value, and had a smaller prostate size. The AUC to predict the probability of having clinically significant prostate cancer was 0.79 and 0.73 for PBCG-RC and ERSPC-RC respectively (p=0.0084). Conclusion In this cohort of patients, both prostate cancer risk calculators performed well in predicting clinically significant prostate cancer risk, although the PBCG-RC showed better accuracy. (AU)

Dynamic assessment of CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores for predicting ischemic stroke and major bleeding in atrial fibrillation patients.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Stroke and bleeding risks in atrial fibrillation (AF) are often assessed at baseline to predict outcomes years later. We investigated whether dynamic changes in CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores over time modify risk prediction. METHODS: We included patients with AF who were stable while taking vitamin K antagonists. During a 6-year follow-up, all ischemic strokes/transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) and major bleeding events were recorded. CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED were recalculated every 2-years and tested for clinical outcomes at 2-year periods. RESULTS: We included 1361 patients (mean CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED 4.0±1.7 and 2.9±1.2). During the follow-up, 156 (11.5%) patients had an ischemic stroke/TIA and 269 (19.8%) had a major bleeding event. Compared with the baseline CHA2DS2-VASc, the CHA2DS2-VASc recalculated at 2 years had higher predictive ability for ischemic stroke/TIA during the period from 2 to 4 years. Integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) and net reclassification improvement (NRI) showed improvements in sensitivity and better reclassification. The CHA2DS2-VASc recalculated at 4 years had better predictive performance than the baseline CHA2DS2-VASc during the period from 4 to 6 years, with an improvement in IDI and an enhancement of the reclassification. The recalculated HAS-BLED at 2-years had higher predictive ability than the baseline score for major bleeding during the period from 2 to 4 years, with significant improvements in sensitivity and reclassification. A slight enhancement in sensitivity was observed with the HAS-BLED score recalculated at 4 years compared with the baseline score. CONCLUSIONS: In AF patients, stroke and bleeding risks are dynamic and change over time. The CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores should be regularly reassessed, particularly for accurate stroke risk prediction.

Concordance between two models of stratification for patients living with HIV infection to providing pharmaceutical care.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the degree of agreement of 2 differents stratification models for pharmaceutical care to people living with HIV. METHODS: This was a single-center observational prospective cohort study of patients with regular follow-up in pharmaceutical care consultations according to the Capacity-Motivation-Opportunity methodology, conducted between January 1 and March 31, 2023. Patients received the pharmacotherapeutic interventions applied routinely to ambulatory care patients according to this model. As part of the usual clinical practice, the presence or absence of the variables that apply to both stratification models were collected. The scores obtained and the corresponding stratification level were collected for each patient according to both stratification models published (ST-2017 and ST-2022). To analyze the reliability between the measurements of 2 numerical score models of the stratification level with both tools, their degree of concordance was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Likewise, reliability was also evaluated from a qualitative perspective by means of Cohen's Kappa coefficient. Additionally, the existence of correlation between the scores of the 2 models was assessed by calculating Pearson's correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Of the total of 758 patients being followed in the cohort, finally, 233 patients were enrolled. The distribution of patients for each stratification model was: ST-2017: 59.7% level-3, 25.3% level-2, and 15.0% level-1, while for ST-2022: 60.9% level-3, 26.6% level-2, and 12.4% level-1. It was observed that the reclassification was symmetrical (P=.317). The qualitative analysis of the agreement between the models showed a good Cohen's kappa value, (K=0.66). A value of 0.563 was found as the intraclass correlation coefficient. Finally, the correlation analysis between the quantitative scores of the 2 models yielded a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.86. CONCLUSIONS: The concordance between the 2 models was good, which confirms that the multidimensional adaptation and simplification of the model were correct and that its use can be extended in routine clinical practice.

Clinical-epidemiological analysis of patients with elevated lipoprotein A in a third level hospital. / Análisis clínico-epidemiológico de pacientes con lipoproteína(a) elevada en un hospital de tercer nivel.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study is to describe the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of our patients with elevated Lp(a). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted on 316 patients with elevated Lp(a) (>125 nmol/L) in a random sample between January and August 2022. We measured epidemiological, anthropometric, clinical and laboratory variables (lipid metabolism parameters, carbohydrates and hormones). RESULTS: Mean age of our sample subject's was 59 ± 15 years with 56% males. The average BMI was 27.6 kg/m2 (71% with elevated BMI). Elevated waist circumference was observed in 54.1% of men and 77.8% of women. 48% had hypertension, 30.7% had diabetes mellitus and 91.5% dyslipidemia. Only 39.7% of the patients had never smoked. The mean values of total cholesterol were 158 ± 45 mg/dl, LDL was 81 ± 39 mg/dl, HDL was 53 ± 17 mg/dl, Triglycerides were 127 ± 61 mg/dl, and Lp(a) was 260 ± 129 nmol/L. Regarding lipid lowering treatment, 89% were on statins, 68.6% on ezetimibe, and 13.7% on PCSK9 inhibitors. 177 patients (57,7%) had established cardiovascular disease (CVD), 16.3% had polyvascular disease, 11.7% had subclinical CVD, and 30.6% had no known CVD. Among patients with established CVD, 174 (98.3%) were on lipid-lowering treatment (97.2% on statins) and 86.4% were on antiplatelet therapy. The mean age of cardiovascular events was 55 ± 12 years in males and 60 ± 11 years in females. 65,1% of female and 56,2% of male patients suffered an early cardiovascular event. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with elevated Lp(a) are at very high cardiovascular risk, particularly for early cardiovascular disease.

Comparison between the European Randomized Study for Screening of Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) and Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group (PBCG) risk calculators: Prediction of clinically significant Prostate Cancer risk in a cohort of patients from Argentina.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of the risk calculators of the European Randomized Study for Screening of Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) and the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group (PBCG) in predicting the risk of presenting clinically significant prostate cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospectively, patients who underwent prostate biopsy at Sanatorio Allende Cerro, Ciudad de Córdoba, Argentina, were identified from January 2018 to December 2021. The probability of having prostate cancer was calculated with the two calculators separately and then the results were compared to establish which of the two performed better. For this, areas under the curve (AUC) were analyzed. RESULTS: 250 patients were included, 140 (56%) presented prostate cancer, of which 92 (65.71%) had clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason score ≥7). The patients who presented cancer were older, had a higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value, and had a smaller prostate size. The AUC to predict the probability of having clinically significant prostate cancer was 0.79 and 0.73 for PBCG-RC and ERSPC-RC respectively (P=0.0084). CONCLUSION: In this cohort of patients, both prostate cancer risk calculators performed well in predicting clinically significant prostate cancer risk, although the PBCG-RC showed better accuracy.

Value of increased soluble suppressor tumorigenicity biomarker 2 (sST2) on admission as an indicator of severity in patients with COVID-19 / Valor del aumento del biomarcador supresor soluble de tumorigenicidad 2 (sST2) al ingreso como indicador de gravedad en pacientes con COVID-19

Background Soluble suppressor of tumorigenicity-2 (sST2) is a biomarker for heart failure and pulmonary injury. We hypothesize that sST2 could help predict severity of SARS-CoV-2 infections. Methods sST2 was analyzed in patients consecutively admitted for SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. Other prognostic markers were also measured. In-hospital complications were registered, including death, ICU admission, and respiratory support requirements. Results 495 patients were studied (53% male, age: 57.6±17.6). At admission, median sST2 concentrations was 48.5ng/mL [IQR, 30.6–83.1ng/mL] and correlated with male gender, older age, comorbidities, other severity biomarkers, and respiratory support requirements. sST2 levels were higher in patients who died (n=45, 9.1%) (45.6 [28.0, 75.9]ng/mL vs. 144 [82.6, 319] ng/mL, p<0.001) and those admitted to ICU (n=46, 9.3%) (44.7 [27.5, 71.3] ng/mL vs. 125 [69.0, 262]ng/mL, p<0.001). sST2 levels>210ng/mL were a strong predictor of complicated in-hospital courses, with higher risk of death (OR, 39.3, CI95% 15.9, 103) and death/ICU (OR 38.3, CI95% 16.3–97.5) after adjusting for all other risk factors. The addition of sST2 enhanced the predictive capacity of mortality risk models. Conclusions sST2 represents a robust severity predictor in COVID-19 and could be an important tool for identifying at-risk patients who may benefit from closer follow-up and specific therapies (AU)

Antecedentes El supresor soluble de tumorigenicidad 2 (sST2) es un biomarcador de insuficiencia cardiaca y daño pulmonar. Nuestra hipótesis es que la determinación de sST2 al ingreso podría ayudar a predecir la gravedad de la infección por SARS-CoV-2. Métodos Se analizó la concentración de sST2 en pacientes ingresados por neumonía por SARS-CoV-2, junto con otros biomarcadores pronósticos conocidos. Asimismo, se registraron las complicaciones durante la estancia hospitalaria, incluidas la muerte, el ingreso en Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos (UCI) y los requerimientos de soporte respiratorio. Resultados Se estudiaron 495 pacientes (53% hombres, edad 57,6 ± 17,6). Al ingreso, la mediana de la concentración de sST2 fue 48,5 ng/mL (índice intercuartílico [IQR] 30,6-83,1 ng/mL) y correlacionó con el género masculino, una mayor edad, comorbilidades, otros biomarcadores de gravedad, así como necesidad de soporte respiratorio. Los niveles de sST2 fueron mayores en pacientes que fallecieron (n = 45, 9,1%) (45,6 [28,0, 75,9] ng/mL vs. 144 [82,6, 319] ng/mL, p < 0,001) y aquellos que requirieron ingreso en UCI (n = 46, 9,3%) (44,7 [27,5, 71,3] ng/mL vs. 125 [69,0, 262] ng/mL, p < 0,001). Así, los valores de sST2 > 210 ng/mL se han demostrado como un fuerte predictor de complicaciones, con un mayor riesgo de fallecimiento (odds ratio [OR], 39,3, intervalo de confianza [IC] 95% 15,9, 103) y fallecimiento o ingreso en UCI (OR 38,3, IC 95% 16,3-97,5), tras el ajuste por todos los demás factores de riesgo. La adición de la determinación de los niveles de sST2 mejoró la potencia predictiva de los modelos de riesgo desarrollados. Conclusiones El sST2 representa un predictor robusto de la gravedad en pacientes con COVID-19 y podría convertirse en una herramienta importante para la identificación de pacientes en riesgo que podrían beneficiarse de un mayor seguimiento y terapias específicas (AU)

Diseño de un nuevo indicador de mortalidad en el síndrome coronario agudo al ingreso en la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos / Design of a new mortality indicator in acute coronary syndrome on admission to the Intensive Care Unit

Objetivo: Diseñar un indicador de mortalidad del síndrome coronario agudo (SCA) en el servicio de medicina intensiva (SMI). Diseño: Estudio descriptivo observacional multicéntrico. Participantes: Pacientes con SCA ingresados en SMI incluidos en el registro ARIAM- SEMICYUC entre enero del 2013 y abril del 2019. Intervenciones: Ninguna. Variables de interés principales: Las variables analizadas fueron demográficas, tiempo de acceso al sistema sanitario y estado clínico. Se analizó la terapia de revascularización, los fármacos y la mortalidad. Se realizó un análisis de regresión logística de COX y posteriormente se diseñó una red neuronal. Se elaboró una curva ROC para calcula la potencia del nuevo score. Finalmente, la utilidad clínica o relevancia del indicador ARIAM se evaluará mediante un gráfico de Fagan. Resultados: Se incluyó a 17.258 pacientes, con una mortalidad al alta del SMI del 3,5% (605). Las variables analizadas con significación estadística (p<0,001) fueron introducidas en el modelo predictivo supervisado, una red neuronal artificial. El nuevo indicador ARIAM mostro una media de 0,0257 (IC del 95%, 0,0245-0,0267) en los pacientes dados de alta de UCI y de 0,27085 (IC del 95%, 0,2533-0,2886) en los que fallecieron, p <0,001. El área ROC del modelo conseguido fue de 0,918 (IC del 95%, 0,907-0,930). En el test de Fagan se demostró que el indicador ARIAM muestra que la probabilidad de fallecimiento es del 19% (IC del 95%, 18-20%) cuando es positivo y del 0,9% (IC del 95%, 0,8-1,01%) cuando es negativo. Conclusiones: Es posible crear un nuevo indicador de mortalidad del SCA en el SMI que sea más exacto, reproducible y actualizable periódicamente. (AU)

Objective: To design a mortality indicator for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the intensive care unit (ICU). Design: Multicenter observational descriptive study. Participants: ACS patients admitted to SMI included in the ARIAM-SEMICYUC registry between January 2013 and April 2019. Interventions: None. Main variables of interest: Variables analyzed were demographic, time of access to the health system, and clinical condition. Revascularization therapy, drugs, and mortality were analyzed. A COX regression analysis was performed and subsequently a neural network was designed. An ROC curve was developed to calculate the power of the new score. Finally, the clinical utility or relevance of the ARIAM's indicator will be evaluated using a Fagan test. Results: 17,258 patients were included, with a 3.5% (605) mortality at discharge from the ICU. The variables analyzed with statistical significance (p<0.001) were entered into the supervised predictive model, an artificial neural network. The new ARIAM's indicator showed a mean of 0.0257 (95% CI: 0.0245–0.0267) in patients discharged from the ICU and 0.27085 (95% CI: 0.2533–0.2886) in those who died, p<0.001. The ROC area of the model achieved was 0.918 (95% CI: 0.907–0.930). The Fagan test showed that the ARIAM's Indicator shows that the probability of death is 19% (95% CI: 18%–20%) when it is positive and 0.9% (95% CI: 0.8%–1.01%) when it is negative. Conclusions: It is possible to create a new mortality indicator for ACS in the ICU that is more accurate, reproducible, and periodically updated. (AU)

Estratificación de riesgo del dolor torácico en el servicio de urgencia / Risk stratification of chest pain in the emergency department

El dolor torácico es un motivo de consulta frecuente en los servicios de urgencia. Su espectro de presentaciones y su diagnóstico diferencial es amplio, con patologías de elevada morbilidad y mortalidad asociadas. Es el síntoma principal en pacientes con un síndrome coronario agudo y, ante su sospecha es mandatorio realizar una evaluación inicial centrada en la estratificación de riesgo de sufrir eventos adversos en cada paciente, para así definir su tratamiento y disposición posterior de forma correcta. Objetivo: presentar los elementos que componen la evaluación inicial del dolor torácico ante una sospecha de síndrome coronario agudo y las herramientas disponibles para realizar la estratificación de riesgo y así guiar la disposición desde el servicio de urgencia. Método: Se realizó una revisión bibliográfica de la literatura sobre la estratificación de riesgo del dolor torácico, buscando la evidencia actual respecto a las herramientas diagnósticas utilizadas habitualmente en el servicio de urgencia. Resultados: Se presenta una revisión con generalidades del dolor torácico, sus diagnósticos diferenciales, los elementos de la evaluación inicial y las herramientas clínicas para la evaluación de riesgo de pacientes con dolor torácico y sospecha de síndrome coronario agudo en el servicio de urgencia. Discusión y conclusiones: La presentación del síndrome coronario agudo es variable en la población. Ante la presencia de un cuadro de dolor atípico y/o un electrocardiograma no diagnóstico, recomendamos el uso de un sistema de puntaje validado como el HEART / HEART pathway para reducir la posibilidad de una inadecuada estratificación de riesgo en el servicio de urgencia

Chest pain is a common complaint in emergency departments. The spectrum of presentation and its differential diagnosis are broad, including pathologies associated with high morbidity and mortality, and it is the main symptom in patients suffering from acute coronary syndrome. If suspected, it is mandatory to work out an initial evaluation focused on the risk stratification of adverse events for each patient to define their correct treatment and disposition. Objective: show the elements that involve the initial evaluation of chest pain suspicious of an acute coronary syndrome, the clinical tools available to perform risk stratification, and guide the disposition from the emergency department. Method: a review of the literature on chest pain risk stratification was performed, looking for current evidence of the most commonly used diagnostic tools in emergency departments. Results: we present a literature review of generalities about chest pain and its differential diagnoses, the elements to consider in the initial evaluation, and clinical tools for risk stratification of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome at the emergency department. Discussion and conclusions: the presentation of acute coronary syndrome is variable in the population. In the presence of atypical chest pain or a non-diagnostic electrocardiogram, we recommend using a validated score as the HEART / HEART Pathway to reduce the chance of inadequate risk stratification in the emergency department.

Decisión de hospitalización o alta en pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca aguda en urgencias, su adecuación con la gravedad de la descompensación e impacto pronóstico / Decisions to admit vs. discharge patients with acute heart failure from the emergency department: consistency with a measure of severity of decompensation and the impact on prognosis

Objetivos. Analizar cómo se ajusta la decisión de ingreso o alta del paciente con insuficiencia cardiaca aguda (ICA) atendido en urgencias a su riesgo de evento adverso, así como su impacto en el pronóstico en aquellos dados de alta desde urgencias. Método. Se recogieron datos basales y clínicos de pacientes diagnosticados de ICA en 16 servicios de urgencias españoles. Los pacientes se estratificaron según la gravedad de la descompensación mediante la escala MEESSI y se analizó la distribución de dicha gravedad en hospitalizados (en conjunto, e individualmente para los servicios con mayor número de hospitalizaciones) y dados de alta desde urgencias. En este último grupo, se analizó el cumplimiento de los siguientes indicadores de calidad: mortalidad por cualquier causa a 30 días (< 2%), reconsulta a urgencias por ICA a 7 días posalta (< 10%), y reconsulta a urgencias u hospitalización por ICA a 30 días posalta (< 20%). Resultados. Se incluyeron 2.855 pacientes (edad mediana = 84 años, RIC = 76-88; mujeres = 54%): 1.042 pacientes (36,5%) de riesgo bajo, 1.239 (43,4%) intermedio, 301 (10,5%) alto y 273 (9,6%) muy alto. La mortalidad a 30 días por categorías de riesgo fue 1,9%, 9,3%, 15,3% y 38,4%, respectivamente; la mortalidad al año 15,4%, 35,6%, 52,0% y 74,2%; y la hospitalización 62,2%, 77,4%, 87,0% y 88,3%. El 47,1% de pacientes dados de alta de urgencias tenía un riesgo incrementado (intermedio, alto o muy alto) y el 30,7% de hospitalizados eran de bajo riesgo. La gravedad de la descompensación según el servicio de hospitalización se incrementaba en el siguiente orden: medicina interna, corta estancia, cardiología, intensivos y geriatría. (AU)

Objectives: To analyze the consistency between decisions to discharge or admit patients with acute heart failure (AHF) treated in emergency departments (EDs) and the level of risk of adverse events, and to analyze the impact of decisions to discharge patients. Material and methods: Prospective study of baseline clinical data collected from patients diagnosed with AHF in 16 Spanish emergency departments. Patients were stratified by severity of decompensated AHF based on MEESSI assessment (Multiple Estimation of Risk Based on the Spanish Emergency Department Score). The distribution of severity was described for patients who were hospitalized (overall and for departments receiving the largest number of admissions) and for discharged patients. We analyzed the data for discharged patients for associations with the following quality-of-care indicators: all-cause mortality of less than 2% at 30 days, revisits to the ED for AHF in less than 10% of patients within 7 days of discharge, and revisits to the ED or admission for AHF in less than 20% within 30 days of discharge. Results: We included 2855 patients with a median (interquartile range) age of 84 (76-88) years. Fifty-four percent were women, 1042 (36.5%) were classified as low risk, 1239 (43.4%) as intermediate risk, 301 (10.5%) as high risk, and 273 (9.6%) as very high risk. Thirty-day mortality rates by level of low to very high risk were 1.9%, 9.3%, 15.3%, and 38.4%, respectively. One-year mortality rates by risk level were 15.4%, 35.6%, 52.0%, and 74.2%. Admission rates by risk level were 62.2%, 77.4%, 87.0%, and 88.3%. Overall, 47.1% o patients discharged from the ED were in the 3 higher-risk categories (intermediate to very high), and 30.7% were in the lowest risk category. The 5 hospital areas receiving the most admissions, in order of lowest-to-highest risk classification, were internal medicine, the short-stay unit, cardiology, intensive care, and geriatrics. (AU)

Decisions to admit vs. discharge patients with acute heart failure from the emergency department: consistency with a measure of severity of decompensation and the impact on prognosis. / Decisión de hospitalización o alta en pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca aguda en urgencias, su adecuación con la gravedad de la descompensación e impacto pronóstico.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the consistency between decisions to discharge or admit patients with acute heart failure (AHF) treated in emergency departments (EDs) and the level of risk of adverse events, and to analyze the impact of decisions to discharge patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective study of baseline clinical data collected from patients diagnosed with AHF in 16 Spanish emergency departments. Patients were stratified by severity of decompensated AHF based on MEESSI assessment (Multiple Estimation of Risk Based on the Spanish Emergency Department Score). The distribution of severity was described for patients who were hospitalized (overall and for departments receiving the largest number of admissions) and for discharged patients. We analyzed the data for discharged patients for associations with the following quality-of-care indicators: all-cause mortality of less than 2% at 30 days, revisits to the ED for AHF in less than 10% of patients within 7 days of discharge, and revisits to the ED or admission for AHF in less than 20% within 30 days of discharge. RESULTS: We included 2855 patients with a median (interquartile range) age of 84 (76-88) years. Fifty-four percent were women, 1042 (36.5%) were classified as low risk, 1239 (43.4%) as intermediate risk, 301 (10.5%) as high risk, and 273 (9.6%) as very high risk. Thirty-day mortality rates by level of low to very high risk were 1.9%, 9.3%, 15.3%, and 38.4%, respectively. One-year mortality rates by risk level were 15.4%, 35.6%, 52.0%, and 74.2%. Admission rates by risk level were 62.2%, 77.4%, 87.0%, and 88.3%. Overall, 47.1% o patients discharged from the ED were in the 3 higher-risk categories (intermediate to very high), and 30.7% were in the lowest risk category. The 5 hospital areas receiving the most admissions, in order of lowest-to-highest risk classification, were internal medicine, the short-stay unit, cardiology, intensive care, and geriatrics. Rates and 95% CIs for quality-of-care indicators in patients discharged from EDs were as follows: 30-day mortality, 4.3% (3.0%-6.1%); ED revisits within 7 days, 11.4% (9.2%-14.0%), and ED revisits or admissions within 30 days, 31.5% (28.0%-35.1%). In patients classified as low risk on ED discharge, these percentages were lower, as follows, respectively: 0.5% (0.1%-1.8%), 10.5% (7.6%-14.0%), and 29.5% (26.6%-32.6%). CONCLUSION: We detected disparity between severity of AHF decompensation and the decision to discharge or admit patients. Outcomes in patients discharged from EDs do not reach the recommended quality-of-care standards. Reducing inconsistencies between severity of decompensation and ED decisions could help to improve quality targets.

OBJETIVO: Analizar cómo se ajusta la decisión de ingreso o alta del paciente con insuficiencia cardiaca aguda (ICA) atendido en urgencias a su riesgo de evento adverso, así como su impacto en el pronóstico en aquellos dados de alta desde urgencias. METODO: Se recogieron datos basales y clínicos de pacientes diagnosticados de ICA en 16 servicios de urgencias españoles. Los pacientes se estratificaron según la gravedad de la descompensación mediante la escala MEESSI y se analizó la distribución de dicha gravedad en hospitalizados (en conjunto, e individualmente para los servicios con mayor número de hospitalizaciones) y dados de alta desde urgencias. En este último grupo, se analizó el cumplimiento de los siguientes indicadores de calidad: mortalidad por cualquier causa a 30 días ( 2%), reconsulta a urgencias por ICA a 7 días posalta ( 10%), y reconsulta a urgencias u hospitalización por ICA a 30 días posalta ( 20%). RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 2.855 pacientes (edad mediana = 84 años, RIC = 76-88; mujeres = 54%): 1.042 pacientes (36,5%) de riesgo bajo, 1.239 (43,4%) intermedio, 301 (10,5%) alto y 273 (9,6%) muy alto. La mortalidad a 30 días por categorías de riesgo fue 1,9%, 9,3%, 15,3% y 38,4%, respectivamente; la mortalidad al año 15,4%, 35,6%, 52,0% y 74,2%; y la hospitalización 62,2%, 77,4%, 87,0% y 88,3%. El 47,1% de pacientes dados de alta de urgencias tenía un riesgo incrementado (intermedio, alto o muy alto) y el 30,7% de hospitalizados eran de bajo riesgo. La gravedad de la descompensación según el servicio de hospitalización se incrementaba en el siguiente orden: medicina interna, corta estancia, cardiología, intensivos y geriatría. El 4,3% de pacientes dados de alta de urgencias (IC 95%: 3,0-6,1) falleció a los 30 días, el 11,4% (9,2-14,0) reconsultó en urgencias a los 7 días, y el 31,5% (28,0-35,1) reconsultó en urgencias o se hospitalizó a los 30 días. Si sólo se consideran los pacientes dados de alta de bajo riesgo, estos porcentajes descienden al 0,5% (0,1-1,8), 10,5% (7,6-14,0) y 29,5% (26,6-32,6), respectivamente. CONCLUSIONES: Existe disparidad entre la gravedad de la descompensación y la decisión en urgencias de hospitalizar o dar de alta a los pacientes con ICA. Los resultados que se obtienen en los pacientes dados de alta desde urgencias no alcanzan los estándares de calidad recomendados. Disminuir las incongruencias entre gravedad de la descompensación y toma de decisión podría contribuir a cumplir con estos estándares.

Condiciones de vida en situaciones excepcionales y su influencia en la mortalidad infantil: hallazgos de referencia / Life conditions in exceptional circumstances and their influence on infant mortality: reference findings i: en

Introducción: La mortalidad infantil se ve afectada por condiciones de vida socioeconómicas y ambientales deletéreas, las cuales se agravan en situaciones excepcionales. Objetivo: Describir la mortalidad infantil en el municipio habanero de La Lisa durante un trienio, según la estratificación diferencial de las condiciones de vida del territorio. Métodos: Se llevó a cabo un estudio observacional, descriptivo y transversal (de tipo ecológico exploratorio) en el municipio capitalino de La Lisa en el trienio 1991-1993, donde las unidades de análisis fueron las áreas de salud estratificadas mediante clasificación automática. Las variables fundamentales fueron las condiciones de vida, según diferentes dimensiones y sus variables, y las tasas centrales de mortalidad infantil en el periodo, considerando sus componentes y la causa básica de muerte. Resultados: Se logró estratificar el municipio según sus condiciones de vida en asentamientos favorables y desfavorables. La mortalidad infantil fue superior en el asentamiento con condiciones de vida desfavorables (10,3 fallecidos por 1000 nacidos vivos), donde predominaron como causas de muerte el traumatismo obstétrico, la muerte idiopática y la sepsis. Conclusiones: Se alcanzó la estratificación según condiciones de vida en el municipio de La Lisa. El asentamiento poblacional con condiciones de vida desfavorables evidenció riesgo de mortalidad infantil diferencial sustantivo, probablemente asociado a factores higiénico-sanitarios y socioeconómicos deletéreos, según las causas de muerte registradas.

Introduction: Infant mortality is affected by deleterious, socioeconomic and environmental living conditions, which are aggravated in exceptional situations. Objective: To describe infant mortality in the Havana municipality of La Lisa during the three-year period 1991-1993, according to the differential stratification of living conditions in the territory. Methods: An observational, descriptive and transversal study (of exploratory ecological type) was carried out in the capital municipality of La Lisa, in the triennium 1991-1993, where the units of analysis were the health areas stratified by automatic classification. The fundamental variables were living conditions, according to different dimensions and their variables, and the central infant mortality rates in the period, considering its components and the basic cause of death. Results: The municipality was stratified according to its living conditions in favorable and unfavorable settlements. Infant mortality was higher in the settlement with unfavorable living conditions (10.3 deaths per 1000 live births), where obstetric trauma, idiopathic death and sepsis predominated as causes of death. Conclusions: Stratification according to living conditions in the municipality of La Lisa was achieved. The population settlement with unfavorable living conditions showed a substantial differential infant mortality risk, probably associated with hygienic-sanitary and socioeconomic factors, according to the causes of death recorded.

Value of increased soluble suppressor tumorigenicity biomarker 2 (sST2) on admission as an indicator of severity in patients with COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Soluble suppressor of tumorigenicity-2 (sST2) is a biomarker for heart failure and pulmonary injury. We hypothesize that sST2 could help predict severity of SARS-CoV-2 infections. METHODS: sST2 was analyzed in patients consecutively admitted for SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. Other prognostic markers were also measured. In-hospital complications were registered, including death, ICU admission, and respiratory support requirements. RESULTS: 495 patients were studied (53% male, age: 57.6±17.6). At admission, median sST2 concentrations was 48.5ng/mL [IQR, 30.6-83.1ng/mL] and correlated with male gender, older age, comorbidities, other severity biomarkers, and respiratory support requirements. sST2 levels were higher in patients who died (n=45, 9.1%) (45.6 [28.0, 75.9]ng/mL vs. 144 [82.6, 319] ng/mL, p<0.001) and those admitted to ICU (n=46, 9.3%) (44.7 [27.5, 71.3] ng/mL vs. 125 [69.0, 262]ng/mL, p<0.001). sST2 levels>210ng/mL were a strong predictor of complicated in-hospital courses, with higher risk of death (OR, 39.3, CI95% 15.9, 103) and death/ICU (OR 38.3, CI95% 16.3-97.5) after adjusting for all other risk factors. The addition of sST2 enhanced the predictive capacity of mortality risk models. CONCLUSIONS: sST2 represents a robust severity predictor in COVID-19 and could be an important tool for identifying at-risk patients who may benefit from closer follow-up and specific therapies.

Design of a new mortality indicator in acute coronary syndrome on admission to the Intensive Care Unit.

OBJECTIVE: To design a mortality indicator in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the intensive care unit (ICU). DESIGN: A multicenter, observational descriptive study was carried out. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with ACS admitted to the ICUs included in the ARIAM-SEMICYUC registry between January 2013 and April 2019. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST: Demographic parameters, time of access to the healthcare system, and clinical condition. Revascularization therapy, drugs and mortality were analyzed. Cox regression analysis was performed, followed by the design of a neural network. A receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was plotted to calculate the power of the new score. Lastly, the clinical utility or relevance of the ARIAM indicator (ARIAM's) was assessed using a Fagan test. RESULTS: A total of 17,258 patients were included in the study, with a mortality rate of 3.5% (n = 605) at discharge from the ICU. The variables showing statistical significance (P < .001) were entered into the supervised predictive model, an artificial neural network. The new ARIAM's yielded a mean of 0.0257 (95%CI: 0.0245-0.0267) in patients discharged from the ICU versus 0.27085 (95%CI: 0.2533-0.2886) in those who died (P < .001). The area under the ROC curve of the model was 0.918 (95%CI: 0.907-0.930). Based on the Fagan test, the ARIAM's showed the mortality risk to be 19% (95%CI: 18%-20%) when positive and 0.9% (95%CI: 0.8%-1.01%) when negative. CONCLUSIONS: A new mortality indicator for ACS in the ICU can be established that is more accurate and reproducible, and periodically updated.

Revisión sistemática sobre el papel de la 18F-FDG PET/TC preoperatoria para el pronóstico y la estratificación de riesgo en pacientes con cáncer de endometrio / A systematic review about the role of preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT for prognosis and risk stratification in patients with endometrial cancer

objetivo Analizar la literatura disponible sobre el valor pronóstico de los parámetros metabólicos de la 18F-FDG PET/TC preoperatoria y su utilidad en la estratificación de riesgo en pacientes con cáncer de endometrio (CE). Material y métodos En búsquedas de Pubmed se utilizó «(endometr* OR uter*) AND (PET OR FDG)» como palabras clave desde enero-2000 hasta junio-2020. Se revisaron referencias en los artículos incluidos buscando posibles publicaciones no incluidas en la primera búsqueda. Se incluyeron los estudios que evaluaron el valor pronóstico de la 18F-FDG PET/TC preoperatoria y su papel para la estratificación del riesgo en pacientes con CE. Los artículos no originales (revisiones, editoriales, cartas, casos legales, entrevistas, informes de casos, etc.) no fueron incluidos. Resultados Veintiséis estudios (1.918 pacientes) fueron elegidos según los criterios de inclusión en esta revisión. Se incluyeron 13 estudios (939 pacientes) relacionados con el papel pronóstico de la 18F-FDG PET/TC preoperatoria y 14 estudios (1.036 pacientes) relacionados con su papel en la estratificación de riesgo. Parámetros como SUVmáx, volumen tumoral metabólico (VTM) y glicólisis total de lesión (GTL) del tumor primario fueron analizados. Conclusiones El SUVmáx preoperatorio es útil para realizar diagnósticos no invasivos y decidir la estrategia terapéutica adecuada, ya que podría utilizarse como marcador pronóstico independiente de recurrencia y supervivencia en el CE. Además, tanto VTM como GTL preoperatorios podrían ser factores pronósticos independientes para predecir recurrencia y supervivencia, pero, aun no existe suficiente evidencia científica. La utilidad del SUVmáx para la estratificación del riesgo es limitada (no existe literatura suficiente acerca de que la 18F-FDG PET/TC pueda sustituir la estadificación quirúrgica), aunque el VTM y la GTL sí que son más precisos y tienen un valioso papel en la estratificación del riesgo del CE (AU)

Objective To analyse the available literature on the prognostic value of preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters and their usefulness in risk stratification in patients with endometrial cancer (EC). Material and methods Pubmed searches used «(endometr* OR uter*) AND (PET OR FDG)» as keywords from January-2000 to June-2020. References in included articles were checked for possible publications not included in the first search. Studies evaluating the prognostic value of preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT and its role for risk stratification in patients with EC were included. Non-original articles (reviews, editorials, letters, legal cases, interviews, case reports, etc.) were not included. Results Twenty-six studies (1918 patients) were selected according to the inclusion criteria in this review. Thirteen studies (939 patients) related to the prognostic role of preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT and 14 studies (1036 patients) related to its role in risk stratification were included. Parameters such as SUVmax, metabolic tumour volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) of the primary tumour were analysed. Conclusions Preoperative SUVmax is useful for non-invasive diagnosis and for deciding the appropriate therapeutic strategy, as it could be used as an independent prognostic marker for recurrence and survival in EC. In addition, both preoperative VTM and GTL could be independent prognostic factors for predicting recurrence and survival, but there is still insufficient scientific evidence. The usefulness of SUVmax for risk stratification is limited (there is insufficient literature that 18F-FDG PET/CT can replace surgical staging), although VTM and GTL are more accurate and have a valuable role in risk stratification of EC. However, larger multicentre studies with adequate follow-up time are needed to confirm these findings (AU)

A systematic review about the role of preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT for prognosis and risk stratification in patients with endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the available literature on the prognostic value of preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters and their usefulness in risk stratification in patients with endometrial cancer (EC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Pubmed searches used "(endometr* OR uter*) AND (PET OR FDG)" as keywords from January-2000 to June-2020. References in included articles were checked for possible publications not included in the first search. Studies evaluating the prognostic value of preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT and its role for risk stratification in patients with EC were included. Non-original articles (reviews, editorials, letters, legal cases, interviews, case reports, etc.) were not included. RESULTS: Twenty-six studies (1918 patients) were selected according to the inclusion criteria in this review. Thirteen studies (939 patients) related to the prognostic role of preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT and 14 studies (1036 patients) related to its role in risk stratification were included. Parameters such as SUVmax, metabolic tumour volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) of the primary tumour were analysed. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative SUVmax is useful for non-invasive diagnosis and for deciding the appropriate therapeutic strategy, as it could be used as an independent prognostic marker for recurrence and survival in EC. In addition, both preoperative VTM and GTL could be independent prognostic factors for predicting recurrence and survival, but there is still insufficient scientific evidence. The usefulness of SUVmax for risk stratification is limited (there is insufficient literature that 18F-FDG PET/CT can replace surgical staging), although VTM and GTL are more accurate and have a valuable role in risk stratification of EC. However, larger multicentre studies with adequate follow-up time are needed to confirm these findings.

Estratificacion de riesgo y pronostico de las eritrocitosis patologicas en la altura / Risk stratification and prognosis of pathological erythrocytoses at altitude

Introducción. Las eritrocitosis patológicas en la altura afectan al 10 % de la población constituyéndose una causa importante de morbilidad por enfermedades no transmisibles. Suscita emergente categorizar la severidad de estas eritrocitosis para estimar su evolución y tratamientos adecuados. Objetivo. Estratificar el riesgo de las eritrocitosis patológicas en la altura considerando parámetros de severidad que sean de utilidad clínica en el pronóstico y tratamiento. Material y métodos. Estudio transversal retrospectivo de 283 historias clínicas de pacientes con eritrocitosis patológica de altura (EPA) o eritrocitosis secundaria (ES), residentes en altura (>3600 m s. n. m) y diagnosticados entre gestiones 2000 a 2021. Se identificó características clínico-laboratoriales diferenciales respecto del diagnóstico, respuesta al tratamiento y evolución de pacientes. Se planteó 3 niveles de estratificación de riesgo (bajo, intermedio, alto) considerando variaciones en síntomas de hiperviscosidad, eritropoyetina, complicaciones y comorbilidades. Resultados. 194 pacientes correspondieron al grupo de riesgo bajo, 67 al riesgo intermedio y 22 al riesgo alto. Riesgo bajo conllevó Epo 30 mUI/ml (30-100 mUI/ml), tratamiento con atorvastatina-aspirina, respuestas parciales y pronóstico regular, concerniendo pacientes con ES asociada a patologías pulmonares leves. Riesgo alto reflejó Epo >100 mUI/ml, inclusión de hidroxiurea al tratamiento con atorvastatina, menor respuesta y pronóstico desfavorable, incumbiendo pacientes >60 años con ES asociada a patologías pulmonares crónicas severas o complicaciones por eritrocitosis. Conclusiones. Contar con niveles de riesgo para las eritrocitosis patológicas permite conjeturar su pronóstico y optimizar decisiones terapéuticas.

Introduction. Pathological erythrocytoses at altitude affect 10% of the population, representing an important cause of morbidity from non-communicable diseases. Categorizing the severity of such erythrocytoses to estimate their evolution and suitable treatments becomes emergent. Objective. To stratify the risk of the pathological erythrocytoses at high altitude considering severity parameters useful for prognosis and treatment. Material and methods. Retrospective cross-sectional study that included 283 medical records of patients with Chronic Mountain Sickness-erythrocytosis (CMS-e) or Secondary Erythrocytosis (SE), inhabitants at high altitude (>3600 m a. s. l.) diagnosed between 2000 to 2021. Differential clinical-laboratory characteristics regarding the diagnosis, response to treatment and evolution of patients were identified. Three risk groups (low, intermediate, high) were raised, considering variations about hyperviscosity symptoms, erythropoietin levels, complications, and comorbidities. Results. 194 patients corresponded to the low-risk group, 67 to the intermediaterisk and 22 to the high-risk. Low-risk group involved Epo 30 mIU/ml (30-100 mIU/ ml), treatment with atorvastatin-aspirin, partial responses and favorable prognosis, concerning patients with SE attributed to mild lung diseases. High-risk reflected Epo >100 mIU/ml, inclusion of hydroxyurea to the treatment with atorvastatin, poor response and unfavorable prognosis, involving patients >60 years of age with SE attributed to severe and chronic lung diseases or complications due to erythrocytosis. Conclusion. Counting on a risk stratification for pathological erythrocytosis at high altitude allows to assess the prognosis and optimize therapeutic decisions.

Miocardio no compactado: ¿una enfermedad o un rasgo fenotípico? / Left ventricular noncompaction: a disease or a phenotypic trait?

El miocardio no compactado es una entidad mal definida y en controversia, con una amplia expresividad fenotípica: desde un simple rasgo anatómico hasta una enfermedad con grave afección cardiaca. Los criterios diagnósticos actuales se basan únicamente en hallazgos morfológicos de hipertrabeculación y tienen una baja especificidad para identificar casos de miocardiopatía. El tratamiento del miocardio no compactado también es heterogéneo y no existen guías de práctica clínica específicas. La insuficiencia cardiaca, las arritmias ventriculares y las embolias sistémicas son las complicaciones cardiovasculares más frecuentes. En esta revisión, se tratan las limitaciones diagnósticas de los diferentes criterios disponibles y se propone una aproximación holística alternativa (que incluye variables funcionales por imagen, de caracterización tisular genética y estudio familiar) que puede ayudar en el diagnóstico diferencial de casos con hipertrabeculación. Se describe la genética de esta entidad y el solapamiento con otras miocardiopatías. Por último, se centra en aspectos debatidos del tratamiento clínico y se propone utilizar las mismas variables ya comentadas para la estratificación pronóstica e individualizar el seguimiento de los pacientes.(AU)

Left ventricular noncompaction is a poorly defined and controversial entity, with wide phenotypic expression: from a simple anatomical trait to a disease with overt cardiac affection. Current diagnostic criteria rely exclusively on morphologic features of hypertrabeculation, which have low specificity for identifying true cardiomyopathy cases. The management of left ventricular noncompaction is also heterogeneous, and there are no dedicated clinical practice guidelines. The most common cardiovascular complications are heart failure, ventricular arrhythmias, and systemic embolisms. In this review, we discuss the diagnostic limitations of the available criteria, and propose a comprehensive alternative approach (including functional imaging variables, tissue characterization, genetics, and family screening) that may help in the differential diagnosis of hypertrabeculation cases. We also describe the genetic background of the disease and discuss the overlap with other cardiomyopathies. Finally, we focus on controversial issues in clinical management and suggest the use of the previously-mentioned variables for risk stratification and for individualization of patient follow-up.(AU)

Managing high blood pressure in hypertensive patients with an acute ischemic stroke / Manejo de la hipertensión arterial en pacientes hipertensos con un accidente cerebrovascular isquémico agudo

Introduction: Arterial hypertension (AH) is one of the key risk factors and triggers for the development of acute cerebrovascular accident. The purpose of the study is to investigate the peculiarities and rates of blood pressure reduction in AH patients during the acute period of ischemic stroke depending on the patients’ sex, age, medical history, and clinical characteristics. Material and methods: The study involved 120 patients aged 41–77 years, of whom there were 47 (39.2%) men and 73 (60.8%) women. All enrolled patients had established diagnoses of AH and acute ischemic cerebrovascular accident (acute ischemic stroke, AIS), with the latter diagnosed within the first 24h from onset. The follow-up period was 14 days. Results: An increase in diastolic blood pressure was associated with higher scores on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS, r=0.301, p=0.026) and Rankin scale (r=0.225, p=0.030), as well as a worse health status at the time of discharge from hospital (r=0.318, p=0.021). Conclusion: Diastolic blood pressure can be considered a marker of the severity of neurological disorders in AIS, which should be considered when monitoring such patients. (AU)

Introducción: La hipertensión arterial (HA) es uno de los principales factores de riesgo y desencadenante del desarrollo del accidente cerebrovascular agudo. El objetivo del estudio es investigar las peculiaridades y tasas de reducción de la presión arterial en pacientes con HA durante el período agudo del ictus isquémico en función del sexo, la edad, la historia clínica y sus características clínicas. Material y métodos: Participaron en el estudio 120 pacientes de 41 a 77 años, de los cuales 47 (39,2%) eran hombres y 73 (60,8%) mujeres. Todos los pacientes incluidos tenían diagnósticos establecidos de HA y accidente cerebrovascular isquémico agudo, este último diagnosticado dentro de las primeras 24 horas desde el inicio. El período de seguimiento fue de 14 días. Resultados: Un aumento en la presión arterial diastólica se asoció con puntajes más altos en la escala de accidentes cerebrovasculares de los institutos nacionales de salud (r=0,301; p=0,026) y la escala de Rankin (r=0,225; p=0,030), así como como un peor estado de salud al momento del alta hospitalaria (r=0,318; p=0,021). Conclusión: La presión arterial diastólica puede considerarse un marcador de la gravedad de los trastornos neurológicos en el accidente isquémico agudo, lo que debe tenerse en cuenta al monitorear a estos pacientes. (AU)

Guía práctica sobre el diagnóstico y tratamiento de la hipertensión arterial en España, 2022. Sociedad Española de Hipertensión - Liga Española para la Lucha contra la Hipertensión Arterial (SEH-LELHA) / 2022 Practice guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension of the Spanish Society of Hypertension

La hipertensión arterial es el principal factor de riesgo de enfermedad y muerte en España. El diagnóstico y el tratamiento de la hipertensión arterial constituyen objetivos básicos de salud porque el control adecuado reduce la morbimortalidad relacionada. El objetivo de esta guía práctica sobre el manejo de la hipertensión arterial de la Sociedad Española de Hipertensión - Liga Española para la Lucha contra la Hipertensión Arterial (SEH-LELHA) es ofrecer unas recomendaciones básicas para la prevención, detección, diagnóstico y tratamiento de la hipertensión arterial. Para ello, la SEH-LELHA asume las directrices de 2018 de la Sociedad Europea de Hipertensión y la Sociedad Europea de Cardiología, si bien se comentan también los aspectos más relevantes de las últimas guías norteamericanas e internacionales. Con respecto al diagnóstico, se mantiene el umbral de 140/90 mmHg como definitorio de hipertensión arterial, se destaca la necesidad de conocer los valores de presión arterial fuera de la consulta, bien mediante monitorización ambulatoria o automedida o ambas, y se establece como prioritaria la estratificación del riesgo cardiovascular del paciente con hipertensión arterial. Con respecto al tratamiento, se destacan las modificaciones del estilo de vida como medida de prevención cardiovascular general y la necesidad de tratamiento antihipertensivo combinado para un control adecuado en la mayoría de los pacientes, reforzando la indicación de dos fármacos como tratamiento inicial, de combinaciones de fármacos en un solo comprimido y de una estrategia activa de consecución del control en un plazo breve de tiempo. El objetivo de control se establece en niveles de presión arterial por debajo de 130/80 mmHg en una amplia mayoría de pacientes. (AU)

Hypertension is the most important risk factor for global disease burden. Detection and management of hypertension are considered as key issues for individual and public health, as adequate control of blood pressure levels markedly reduces morbidity and mortality associated with hypertension. Aims of these practice guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension of the Spanish Society of Hypertension include offering simplified schemes for diagnosis and treatment for daily practice, and strategies for public health promotion. The Spanish Society of Hypertension assumes the 2018 European guidelines for management of arterial hypertension developed by the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Hypertension, although relevant aspects of the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines and the 2020 International Society of Hypertension guidelines are also commented. Hypertension is defined as a persistent elevation in office systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg, and assessment of out-of-office blood pressure and global cardiovascular risk are considered of key importance for evaluation and management of hypertensive patients. The target for treated blood pressure should be < 130/80 for most patients. The treatment of hypertension involves lifestyle interventions and drug therapy. Most people with hypertension need more than one antihypertensive drug for adequate control, so initial therapy with two drugs, and single pill combinations are recommended for a wide majority of hypertensive patients. (AU)

[2022 Practice guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension of the Spanish Society of Hypertension]. / Guía práctica sobre el diagnóstico y tratamiento de la hipertensión arterial en España, 2022. Sociedad Española de Hipertensión - Liga Española para la Lucha contra la Hipertensión Arterial (SEH-LELHA).

Hypertension is the most important risk factor for global disease burden. Detection and management of hypertension are considered as key issues for individual and public health, as adequate control of blood pressure levels markedly reduces morbidity and mortality associated with hypertension. Aims of these practice guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension of the Spanish Society of Hypertension include offering simplified schemes for diagnosis and treatment for daily practice, and strategies for public health promotion. The Spanish Society of Hypertension assumes the 2018 European guidelines for management of arterial hypertension developed by the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Hypertension, although relevant aspects of the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines and the 2020 International Society of Hypertension guidelines are also commented. Hypertension is defined as a persistent elevation in office systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg, and assessment of out-of-office blood pressure and global cardiovascular risk are considered of key importance for evaluation and management of hypertensive patients. The target for treated blood pressure should be < 130/80 for most patients. The treatment of hypertension involves lifestyle interventions and drug therapy. Most people with hypertension need more than one antihypertensive drug for adequate control, so initial therapy with two drugs, and single pill combinations are recommended for a wide majority of hypertensive patients.